Is there anyone out there who can find a super high profile tech journalist or someone in the Silicon Valley scene to expose how TeamViewer is hating on person's with disabilities who use this tool (FOR NON COMMERCIAL USE) as an assistive technology so they don't have to drive to their families' homes to help with computer problems. If you use TeamViewer to monitor one or several devices running a server operating system, commercial use appl ies. Commercial use can apply to non-profit organizations: If you work for a non-profit organization, the use of TeamViewer can be commercial if you or another person in the organization receive a salary from the organization.
I agree with all the sentiments stated here. For my job, I do a lot of remote support. I've looked all over for a good remote support program, and so far every one of them has had their drawbacks. The lack of good options out there is to the point that I've seriously thought about trying to create my own; however, that is a big enough undertaking that I haven't tried to do that yet.
Recently, I've been using Team Viewer, but there commercial use thing always gets me. I would have paid for their professional version a long time ago, except for the ridiculous price tag. I could understand a $100 or $200 price, but $700 is just ridiculous.
I tried the UltraViewer out just now and it seems to work decently well. The color rendering seems off just a bit, and the screen rendering seems a little slower than I'm used to, but otherwise it seems like it could be a promising alternative. The setup was very straightforward and worked without forwarding any ports or anything.
I wish you guys all the best. Good luck.
Teamviewer Commercial Use Suspected Mac Software
